Why Real Intimacy Requires a Real Person

Intimacy is often imagined as the erosion of boundaries, a merging that promises closeness at the cost of individuality. But this assumption belongs to an undeveloped self, one that relies on separation to maintain coherence. Where personhood is thin, intimacy feels dangerous; where it is inflated, intimacy becomes performative. Real intimacy, by contrast, requires a self that is sufficiently formed to remain present without defense and open without collapse.

A real person is not one who has perfected identity, but one who has acquired gravity—an inner coherence born of lived experience, conscious suffering, and the digestion of instinctual life. Such a person no longer needs to protect a central narrative in order to exist. Boundaries become flexible rather than rigid, permeable rather than porous. Contact can deepen without possession, and difference can remain without threat.

Intimacy at this level is not fusion but interpenetration. Two persons meet not by dissolving into one another, but by allowing their fields of presence to overlap. What is exchanged is not reassurance or completion, but substance. In this way, intimacy does not diminish personhood; it completes it. Only a real person can afford to be truly close—because nothing essential is at risk.

Previous
Previous

On Being Right

Next
Next

In the Spirit of Love